Skip to topic | Skip to bottom
Home

Start of topic | Skip to actions

Detonation Front Structure

Problem Description

In this study, we performed two-dimensional unsteady simulations of detonation propagation using a five-step simmplified chemistry to examine the qualitative differences in the cellular instability of detonation fronts corresponding to various degrees of competition between the chain-branching and reactive intermediate production. The 2D computation configuration is shown in the folowing.
Computational model in a shock-attached frame

Numerical Simulation

  • Reactive Euler equations in two dimensions (Cartesian coordinate system), using an ideal gas and a five-step, four pseudo species chemical reaction model characterizing hydrogen-oxygen chemistry.
  • Time-operator splitting to decouple hydrodynamic transport and chemical reaction
  • Explicit second order Godunov-type numerical scheme incorporating a hybrid Roe-solver-based method
  • AMR-computation with coarse grid of 600x1000; one additional refinement level, with a refinement factor 3

Initial and Boundary Conditions

  • A planar ZND profile was initially placed approximately 10 induction lengths away from the right boundary, and an unreacted hot pocket was placed to the left of the shock in the burned products.
  • Cold reactants flow into the domain from the left at a constant velocity %$U_{CJ}$%, hot burnt product flow out of the domain with zero gradient conditions for all flow variables, upper and lower boundaries were no-slip solid walls.

Computational Cases

The physical parameters for two simulation cases which represent regular and irregular shock fronts are listed in the folowing. %$P_s$% is the post-shock pressure, %$T_s$% is the post-shock temperature, %$\Delta$% is the induction zone length (distance between the shock to the maximum temperature gradient) and %$\theta$% is the reduced effective activation energy.

Case %$U_{CJ}$% (m/s) %$P_s$% (atm) %$T_s$% (K) %$\Delta$% (mm) %$\theta$%
1 1785 30.7 2094 0.029 4.3
2 1390 19.5 1432 0.64 10

Results

  • Numerical smoke foils

Case 1: regular structure

Smoke foils of case 1.

Case 2: irregular structure

Smoke foils of case 2.

  • Flow fields (from the left to the right: temperature, mass fraction of reactants, chain radicals, peroxide species)

Case 1: regular structure (see movie of this case (1.4MB))

Flow fields of case 1.

Case 2: irregular structure (see movie of this case (2.5MB))

Flow fields of case 2.

  • Experimental measurements (Pintgen et al 2003, Combustion and Flame)

Smoke foil and OH profile for 2H2+O2+17Ar mixture

Smoke foil and OH profile for 2H2+O2+17Ar mixture.

Smoke foil and OH profile for 2H2+O2+3N2 mixture

Smoke foil and OH profile for 2H2+O2+17Ar mixture.

  • For more information please see reference

Z. Liang, S. Browne, R. Deiterding, and J. E. Shepherd, Detonation Front Structure and the Competition for Radicals, Proc. Combust. Inst., doi:10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.244. PDF of this paper (2.1MB)


-- ZheLiang - 21 Aug 2006

I Attachment sort Size Date Who Comment
XD0.75-y2.mpg 1400.6 K 25 Aug 2006 - 21:55 ZheLiang Movie of case 1
XD0.84-y2.mpg 2478.2 K 25 Aug 2006 - 21:56 ZheLiang Movie of case 2
two-column.pdf 2082.1 K 25 Aug 2006 - 22:45 ZheLiang CI Paper

You are here: Amroc > ClawpackHome > NumSimGasDet > Detonations5StepChemistry

to top

Copyright © 1997-2024 California Institute of Technology.